Australian Fashion Retailer
$130K in ad spend. The question was whether it could return ten times that — and whether those returns could be sustained over years, not just a single campaign cycle.

The Challenge
An Australian fashion retailer was generating decent impressions but converting them poorly — CTR stuck at just 0.9%, customer acquisition costs were climbing, and generic ad messaging wasn't resonating with the audience. Campaigns mixing search, display, and remarketing in a single undifferentiated structure made it impossible to optimise individual channel performance.
Our Solution
GYSP restructured the entire PPC architecture using Single Keyword Ad Groups organised by product category, enabling precise relevance and quality score improvement. Dynamic keyword insertion and seasonal promotional messaging were tested through systematic A/B testing. Bidding was transitioned from manual CPC to Target ROAS, and spend was reallocated toward the highest-performing segments. Conversion optimisation work simplified the checkout process and added urgency elements — driving a 932.92% sustained ROAS across a 4-year engagement.
Facing a similar challenge? Get a no-commitment technical brief.
Get free briefKey Deliverables
- Campaign restructure using Single Keyword Ad Groups by product category
- Dynamic keyword insertion for precise ad relevance and quality score improvement
- Seasonal promotional messaging via systematic A/B testing
- Manual CPC to Target ROAS bidding transition with spend reallocation
- Checkout simplification and urgency-element conversion optimisation
- 4-year sustained engagement delivering compounding ROAS improvements
Services Delivered
- Digital Marketing
- PPC
- Performance Marketing
Tech Stack
Frequently Asked Questions
What is ROAS and how did GYSP achieve 932.92% for an Australian fashion retailer?+
ROAS (Return on Ad Spend) measures revenue generated per dollar of ad spend — 932.92% means every $1 spent returned $9.33 in revenue. GYSP achieved this over a 4-year sustained engagement by restructuring campaigns into Single Keyword Ad Groups for precision targeting, transitioning from manual CPC to Target ROAS bidding, implementing seasonal promotional messaging through systematic A/B testing, and continuously reallocating budget toward the highest-returning segments.
What are Single Keyword Ad Groups (SKAGs) and why do they improve Google Ads performance?+
SKAGs structure each ad group around a single keyword, so the keyword, ad copy, and landing page are perfectly aligned. Google's Quality Score rewards this alignment with higher ad rankings at lower CPCs — because the ad is highly relevant to the search query. For the Australian fashion retailer, restructuring from broad ad groups into SKAGs by product category significantly improved Quality Scores, reducing cost-per-click while maintaining or improving ad position.
How did GYSP transition from manual CPC to Target ROAS bidding?+
The transition required accumulating sufficient conversion data for Google's smart bidding algorithm to optimise effectively. GYSP first ran manual CPC with careful conversion tracking to build the data baseline, then gradually introduced Target ROAS with conservative targets before progressively tightening them as confidence in the algorithm's performance grew. Budget was shifted from lower-performing manual segments to Target ROAS campaigns as their performance proved consistent.
What conversion optimisation tactics did GYSP use to improve checkout rates?+
GYSP implemented two main CRO interventions: checkout simplification (reducing the number of steps and form fields between add-to-cart and payment confirmation) and urgency elements (limited-time offer messaging and low-stock indicators on high-converting product pages). Both were validated through A/B testing before rollout — ensuring changes were data-driven. Combined with the PPC restructure, these improvements amplified ROAS by converting more of the paid traffic the campaigns generated.
Work with GYSP
Want results like these?
Get a free technical brief — architecture options, cost estimates, and a delivery timeline tailored to your challenge.
- 48-hour turnaround
- Senior engineers only
- No commitment required
Or call: +1 (929) 588-8364
Services Used
More eCommerce & Retail Case Studies
eCommerce & RetailHommey
A home services marketplace built to personalise at scale — real-time inventory, region-specific campaigns, and mobile-first UX that needed to work flawlessly from day one.
eCommerce & RetailUS Gaming Retailer
Organic traffic stuck at 29K. Product searches going to competitors. Local visibility near zero. A US gaming retailer needed SEO that drove real revenue — not just better rankings.
eCommerce & RetailUS eCommerce Brand
Cost-per-purchase above $70 with no clear path down. Budget leaking across underperforming creatives, weak retargeting, and campaigns that weren't structured to convert.
